Musings On Another AJC Annexation Article
Decatur Metro | January 26, 2009I have two questions for the AJC’s April Hunt and one for the city of Avondale after reading this latest AJC annexation article…
First to Ms. Hunt -
1. Does the city of Decatur really care whether residents way up near Doraville accept annexation? Are we really simplistic enough to think its even remotely an apples-to-apples comparison?
2. Is it really accurate to assert that it was negative vocal opposition at commission meetings that killed Decatur’s annexation plan?
So, assuming that the city had bullet-proof data to show how a large-scale annexation would reduce property taxes, all it would take to kill such a huge plan would be vocal opposition by nonresidents at a commission meeting? So riddle me this – assuming that this vocal opposition represents the will of the annexed areas (which is still not really known) and the initiative failed to get the necessary 50% vote, would the city commissioners really be any worse for wear? Might they actually be better off for having tried to lower residents’ taxes?
As I’ve said before, I believe it had a lot more to do with the irreconcilable student enrollment data than anything else. But that’s just my not-so-humble opinion.
And finally, to Avondale -
3. Avondale, I love you, but why so reactionary? If you want to annex part of College Ave, just do it! Why are you letting Decatur’s actions dictate your border?








