Decatur Metro: Community Smatter
  • rss
  • Home
  • Contact
  • Decatur Tips & Links
  • Headlines
  • Events
  • Advertise
  • Comments Policy
  • EOTS

315′s Dawn Redwoods Valued at $38,000

Decatur Metro | October 7, 2010

Neil Norton sends in a few pics and writes…

The five trees are dawn redwoods. FYI, during a recent tree survey the compensatory value for the five trees was $37,992. The structural or compensatory value of the trees was based on methods from the Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers (1992). Compensatory value, which is based on the replacement cost of a similar tree, is used for monetary settlement for damage or death of plants through litigation, insurance claims of direct payment, and loss of property value for income tax deduction.

The five redwoods would be taken down if the developer of the 315 West Ponce “Decatur Court” property were to construct the proposed two-story retail building along West Ponce.  The plan still hasn’t been before any of Decatur’s boards or commissions.  Last we heard, the developer was “talking with the neighborhood” about the plan.

A couple other close-up shots of the trees after the jump.

Categories
Construction, Environment
Tags
315 West Ponce de Leon, compensatory value of trees, Dawn Redwoods, Decatur Court

« Changing “Shamrock Middle School” to “Druid Hills Middle School” The GREATEST Online Atlanta Demographic Maps EVER! »

19 Responses to “315′s Dawn Redwoods Valued at $38,000”

  1. Tom L says:
    October 7, 2010 at 12:31 pm

    My suggestion: Tear down the building and leave the trees.

    • Grayson says:
      October 7, 2010 at 1:15 pm

      TOM L – How awesome would that be!?

  2. Another Rick says:
    October 7, 2010 at 12:50 pm

    I am generable all for more retail development, mixed use and high density residential, etc. Nevertheless, I also love those trees that I have walked by and appreciated for years. The lose to me will not be measurable. Perhaps the city, as a condition of the rezoning, should require the developer to pay $38,000 to some group working to improve our landscape.

  3. karass says:
    October 7, 2010 at 12:55 pm

    Why is it that a developer gets away with a lowball cost but, if I were to try to achieve this kind of landscaping at home, it would cost so much more?

  4. Scott says:
    October 7, 2010 at 12:59 pm

    If this is really a money issue, maybe you should have a post called “Two of 315′s parking spaces valued at $50,000.” Seriously, making a monetary argument about trees misses the point of their true worth. With apologies to Kilmer, “Trees” just wouldn’t read the same like this:

    I THINK that I shall never see
    Poems that pencil out like trees

    Blessed with assets oh so sweet
    To fatten up the balance sheet

    Or ones whose virtue ever grows
    Should litigation make it so

    These poems, their value truly lacks
    T’is God who grows all dem phat stacks.

    • Parker Cross says:
      October 8, 2010 at 9:04 am

      Nicely done, Scott!

  5. No surprise says:
    October 7, 2010 at 2:37 pm

    I’ve always thought those trees looked crappy. They look out of place, and are laid out funny. The building is ugly too, so the combo is dreadful. I think the owner should expand the tall building by covering the whole exterior- leaving the orginal building as the core, with a more classical facade with larger windows – and balconies, perhaps.

    • karass says:
      October 7, 2010 at 2:50 pm

      Oh, we like those trees maybe because the kids can recognize them after learning about the history of the Dawn Redwoods at the Botanical Gardens. We like the way they keep their conical shape and are never straggly.

      But the building is definitely bad, real bad, 1960s IBM-eggish.

  6. Redwoods on Ponce says:
    October 7, 2010 at 2:58 pm

    Dear No Surprise: We think you are ugly and your general layout is ugly, and your fashion choice is really questionable. In fact We’d prefer if you moved to Cobb County.
    Sincerely,
    the Redwoods on Ponce

    • Decatur Metro says:
      October 7, 2010 at 3:03 pm

      Wow…trees are much more crass and sensitive than I realized!

  7. TeeRuss says:
    October 7, 2010 at 3:30 pm

    Trees are nice to look at and all, but they don’t provide low cost goods to poor people. Take them down and put in a Dollar General.

  8. No surprise says:
    October 7, 2010 at 4:01 pm

    Ahh – the old “move to Cobb county” retort. How lame. I was making a very Inside the Perimeter-esque critique of the placement and arrange ment of the trees. Individually it is a beautiful ornamental tree ( with a cool story behind it). But packed in a line sticking out to the side of a terribly designed building yeilds a trainwreck. Kinda like landscaping disasters you see in the suburbs.

    • Decatur Metro says:
      October 7, 2010 at 4:05 pm

      I’d be interesting to see a pic of these trees right after they were planted. I wonder how big they were back in the day.

  9. No surprise says:
    October 7, 2010 at 4:05 pm

    I will add that they should leave the outside one, and use that to anchor a well-designed landscaped area – but please cover up the fascade of that building.

    • "Naaman" Gibbets says:
      October 7, 2010 at 5:41 pm

      So the building is the problem?

  10. Occi says:
    October 7, 2010 at 5:33 pm

    Leave the trees and get rid of the building. The monetary cost of the trees do not do justice to the value of the 5 trees. Wish the city or country would triple the fines for each tree so Developers would quit tearing down all of nature in the path of their development. Until the fines have a serious bite it is cheaper from the Developers to just pay the fines.

  11. Mair says:
    October 7, 2010 at 9:40 pm

    Please save the trees. I have always liked them. They are a nice addition to my neighborhood. And, I never fail to admire them. One of my favorite images is what I see my in rearview mirror when I am in line at the Wachovia drive thru: the trees, their massive trunks, the store fronts, pedestrians, bright sunlight, cool shade in an oblong frame.

  12. altmod says:
    October 8, 2010 at 8:28 am

    Besides the big Magnolia(s) in front of the Rec Center, those are my favorite trees in the city. Every time I’m enjoying my snoball I think about how cruddy it is going to be to see them cut down. As for the building, it served as a lovely projection screen for Lima and I like it.

  13. Williek104 says:
    October 8, 2010 at 12:04 pm

    Neil: thank you for bring this to the attention of folks in Decatur. I like mixed-use development, but not at the expense of these trees.

Subscribe

     

DM Sponsors




Popular Posts

  • Westchester Redistricting Options Available Online for Viewing
  • Free-For-All Friday 11/1/13
  • Walmart Cleared For Suburban Plaza
  • Decatur Schools Posts 4th Rezoning Option Online
  • Kimball House Ranks as One of the "Hottest" Cocktail Bars in US by Eater

1 - Decatur Blogs

  • 3ten
  • AsianCajuns
  • Be Active Decatur
  • Bits and Breadcrumbs
  • Clairmont Heights Civic Assoc.
  • DCPLive
  • Decatur Book Festival
  • Decatur Pics
  • Decatur Wine & Food Dude
  • Little Blog of Stories
  • Next Stop…Decatur
  • Running With Tweezers
  • Southern Urban Homestead
  • The Decatur Minute
  • Verb

2 - Atlanta Blogs

  • Atlanta Unfiltered
  • Baby Got Books
  • DeKalb Officers
  • DeKalb School Watch
  • Drive a Faster Car
  • East Lake Neighborhood
  • Fresh Loaf
  • Heneghan’s Dunwoody
  • Like the Dew
  • Live Apartment Fire
  • Pecanne Log
  • Sitting Pugs
  • That's Just Peachy

3 - Neighborhood Sites

  • Decatur Heights
  • Decatur Heights DHNA
  • Glennwood Estates
  • MAK Historic District
  • Oakhurst
  • Winnona Park

4 - Decatur History

  • DeKalb History Center

5 - Decatur News

  • City of Decatur
  • Decatur Business Assoc.
  • Patch – Decatur-Avondale

6 - Decatur Non-Profits

  • Atlanta Legal Aid Society
  • Community Center of S. Decatur
  • Decatur Arts Alliance
  • Decatur Education Foundation
  • Decatur Preservation Alliance
  • Oakhurst Community Garden
  • The OCF

Counter

Recent comments

  • SteveSteve
    • Walmart Cleared For Suburban Plaza
  • Nelliebelle1197Nelliebelle1197
    • Free-For-All Friday 11/1/13
  • Nelliebelle1197Nelliebelle1197
    • Free-For-All Friday 11/1/13
  • Nancy WilkinsonNancy Wilkinson
    • Free-For-All Friday 11/1/13
  • Nancy WilkinsonNancy Wilkinson
    • Free-For-All Friday 11/1/13
  • decaturkjdecaturkj
    • Three More K-3 Rezoning Options Posted on CSD Website
  • smalltowngalsmalltowngal
    • Walmart Cleared For Suburban Plaza
  • At Home in DecaturAt Home in Decatur
    • Walmart Cleared For Suburban Plaza
  • G BuckG Buck
    • Walmart Cleared For Suburban Plaza
  • G BuckG Buck
    • Walmart Cleared For Suburban Plaza
  • GolfballGolfball
    • Walmart Cleared For Suburban Plaza
  • Nelliebelle1197Nelliebelle1197
    • Walmart Cleared For Suburban Plaza
  • JoeBlowJoeBlow
    • Walmart Cleared For Suburban Plaza
  • Nelliebelle1197Nelliebelle1197
    • Walmart Cleared For Suburban Plaza
  • At Home in DecaturAt Home in Decatur
    • Three More K-3 Rezoning Options Posted on CSD Website
Plugin by Yellingnews

Search DM

DM Archives

Awards


Best Local Blog

Best Local Blog

Best Neighborhood News

Post Calendar

October 2010
M T W T F S S
« Sep   Nov »
  1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox