Decatur City Commission Denies Subdivision of Oakhurst Dog Park
Decatur Metro | May 19, 2015 | 10:06 amAfter hearing nearly 50 minutes of comment from the petitioners and the community, the Decatur City Commission unanimously denied the subdivision of the Oakhurst Dog Park last night. (You can view the video HERE)
Before voting, Mayor Jim Baskett made the following statement…
“We have always been very protective of personal property rights on this commission. I personally have been very protective of personal property rights as long as I’ve been on this commission. So we have to have very good and very strong reasons to deny petitioner’s use of their property in any kind of way. In this particular instance we’re being asked – or some people have thought – that we had the power to keep the Boys & Girls Club from selling the property. We don’t. Or that we had the power that we could do this or that or the other. But we don’t.”
“The question it comes down to is ‘Do we subdivide this property based on four simple standards?’ And I look at the standards as a suitable use of the property in comparison to the adjacent properties. Is it adversely affecting the use of adjacent properties or even their future uses? Does it cause a problem with the streets or transportation facilities, utilities or schools? In general, does it have an impact on the public health, safety, morality or the general welfare of the community?”
“And when I think about those beautiful trees and when I think about the use of this property for the last – at least -100 years. [Indiscernible] This is a public service really that the Boys and Girls Club offers and that’s why it was sold at the time it was sold and the way it was sold. Because it would continue to be a public service use. And when I look at the way it’s been used and I look at what could be lost here, the potential loss here, with just so little to gain, I can’t personally come to any other conclusion that this not in the general best welfare of our community at large.”
“Public safety may be a factor here with traffic. Public Health. But the main thing is the general welfare of our community. I just don’t believe that a subdivision of that property is good for the general welfare of our community. That just where I come down.”
Following the Mayor’s remarks, Commissioner Garrett moved for denial, which was seconded by Mayor Pro-Tem Cunningham. As stated above, the final vote was unanimous.