<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: City Commission Refers Parkwood Annexation Petition To Staff For Review</title>
	<atom:link href="/2014/02/04/city-commission-refers-parkwood-annexation-petition-to-staff-for-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.decaturmetro.com/2014/02/04/city-commission-refers-parkwood-annexation-petition-to-staff-for-review/</link>
	<description>Decatur Georgia News, Events, Atlanta News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2014 02:06:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DEM</title>
		<link>http://www.decaturmetro.com/2014/02/04/city-commission-refers-parkwood-annexation-petition-to-staff-for-review/#comment-468544</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DEM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 21:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.decaturmetro.com/?p=29465#comment-468544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree that taxes are too high in Decatur and everywhere else.  Let&#039;s cut &#039;em all by 50%, across the board.  For starters.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that taxes are too high in Decatur and everywhere else.  Let&#8217;s cut &#8216;em all by 50%, across the board.  For starters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brianc</title>
		<link>http://www.decaturmetro.com/2014/02/04/city-commission-refers-parkwood-annexation-petition-to-staff-for-review/#comment-468541</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brianc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 20:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.decaturmetro.com/?p=29465#comment-468541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes. We knew going in that we were going to be paying relatively hefty tax bills for a school system that we don&#039;t have kids to send to, but that was ok because of the other benefits of living in downtown Decatur (the primary one for us being the ability to live a less car-dependent lifestyle). But there is a limit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. We knew going in that we were going to be paying relatively hefty tax bills for a school system that we don&#8217;t have kids to send to, but that was ok because of the other benefits of living in downtown Decatur (the primary one for us being the ability to live a less car-dependent lifestyle). But there is a limit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bin Birru</title>
		<link>http://www.decaturmetro.com/2014/02/04/city-commission-refers-parkwood-annexation-petition-to-staff-for-review/#comment-468538</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bin Birru]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 20:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.decaturmetro.com/?p=29465#comment-468538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And that, my friends, is Number Wang.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And that, my friends, is Number Wang.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cubalibre</title>
		<link>http://www.decaturmetro.com/2014/02/04/city-commission-refers-parkwood-annexation-petition-to-staff-for-review/#comment-468536</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cubalibre]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 20:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.decaturmetro.com/?p=29465#comment-468536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;It is going to be our biggest challenge as a city to keep the schools attractive and high performing without taxing the empty nesters or no-kid citizens into moving out and selling to families with school age kids.&quot;

Couldn&#039;t agree more. As a no-kid citizen myself, I can tell you that others like us have already started selling, because there really doesn&#039;t seem to be any end in sight for all of the planned spending increases (including potential tax hikes) that the City justifies by pointing to the needs of the school system, which already gets the lion&#039;s share of our tax dollars. This is exacerbated by the gung-ho COD parents whose tunnel vision focuses on schools, schools, schools--and fails to take into account that killing the (no-kid) geese that lay the golden eggs is eventually going to catch up with the City, and what will happen then? Some of these folk may tell themselves it won&#039;t matter, since their kids will likely have aged out of the system--but they&#039;re wrong, because their own property values will be affected if our taxes are too high, our schools are too crowded, or both.  Like you, WP, I don&#039;t want to seem unwelcoming, by any means--but I WOULD like to see more of a concerted plan to deal with this, instead of the City&#039;s &quot;we&#039;ll cross that bridge when we come to it&quot; approach.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It is going to be our biggest challenge as a city to keep the schools attractive and high performing without taxing the empty nesters or no-kid citizens into moving out and selling to families with school age kids.&#8221;</p>
<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree more. As a no-kid citizen myself, I can tell you that others like us have already started selling, because there really doesn&#8217;t seem to be any end in sight for all of the planned spending increases (including potential tax hikes) that the City justifies by pointing to the needs of the school system, which already gets the lion&#8217;s share of our tax dollars. This is exacerbated by the gung-ho COD parents whose tunnel vision focuses on schools, schools, schools&#8211;and fails to take into account that killing the (no-kid) geese that lay the golden eggs is eventually going to catch up with the City, and what will happen then? Some of these folk may tell themselves it won&#8217;t matter, since their kids will likely have aged out of the system&#8211;but they&#8217;re wrong, because their own property values will be affected if our taxes are too high, our schools are too crowded, or both.  Like you, WP, I don&#8217;t want to seem unwelcoming, by any means&#8211;but I WOULD like to see more of a concerted plan to deal with this, instead of the City&#8217;s &#8220;we&#8217;ll cross that bridge when we come to it&#8221; approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larkspur</title>
		<link>http://www.decaturmetro.com/2014/02/04/city-commission-refers-parkwood-annexation-petition-to-staff-for-review/#comment-468526</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Larkspur]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.decaturmetro.com/?p=29465#comment-468526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My assumption, which is only speculation which is why I qualified it with &quot;may&quot;, was that people moving into Decatur with young children might not currently perceive  Parkwood as desirable as other neighborhoods that are closer to their schools..  That may or may not change with the opening of Westchester.  I was thinking more of the appeal to prospective homebuyers that a new neighborhood school might have, rather than attending an overcrowded school.  Of course, there is the possibility that Parkwood would become less desirable too.   Perceptions may not match reality. Neighborhoods in Decatur have changed in desirability over the years and there is no reason to think they won&#039;t continue to.  When I moved to Decatur, the north side neighborhoods (particularly the Great Lakes) were thought to be the most desirable places to live.  Oakhurst certainly was not at the time, but now it is one of the most desirable neighborhoods.  Perceptions have changed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My assumption, which is only speculation which is why I qualified it with &#8220;may&#8221;, was that people moving into Decatur with young children might not currently perceive  Parkwood as desirable as other neighborhoods that are closer to their schools..  That may or may not change with the opening of Westchester.  I was thinking more of the appeal to prospective homebuyers that a new neighborhood school might have, rather than attending an overcrowded school.  Of course, there is the possibility that Parkwood would become less desirable too.   Perceptions may not match reality. Neighborhoods in Decatur have changed in desirability over the years and there is no reason to think they won&#8217;t continue to.  When I moved to Decatur, the north side neighborhoods (particularly the Great Lakes) were thought to be the most desirable places to live.  Oakhurst certainly was not at the time, but now it is one of the most desirable neighborhoods.  Perceptions have changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: www.decaturmetro.com @ 2014-09-17 22:06:42 by W3 Total Cache -->