<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Decatur Still Georgia&#8217;s Most Walkable City</title>
	<atom:link href="/2011/12/05/decatur-still-georgias-most-walkable-city/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.decaturmetro.com/2011/12/05/decatur-still-georgias-most-walkable-city/</link>
	<description>Decatur Georgia News, Events, Atlanta News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 14:44:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://www.decaturmetro.com/2011/12/05/decatur-still-georgias-most-walkable-city/#comment-163376</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 20:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.decaturmetro.com/?p=21282#comment-163376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Get with the program Vidal and Lamont.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get with the program Vidal and Lamont.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: At Home in Decatur</title>
		<link>http://www.decaturmetro.com/2011/12/05/decatur-still-georgias-most-walkable-city/#comment-163336</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[At Home in Decatur]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.decaturmetro.com/?p=21282#comment-163336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, right.  Folks who opposed the sidewalks included folks who still believe that sidewalks bring ne&#039;er-do-wells into the neighborhood--some of them were seniors and some have since died, some were folks who had planted stuff on the city&#039;s right of way part of &quot;their&quot; yard, and some were folks who felt that sidewalks would aggravate storm water drainage issues.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, right.  Folks who opposed the sidewalks included folks who still believe that sidewalks bring ne&#8217;er-do-wells into the neighborhood&#8211;some of them were seniors and some have since died, some were folks who had planted stuff on the city&#8217;s right of way part of &#8220;their&#8221; yard, and some were folks who felt that sidewalks would aggravate storm water drainage issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana Blankenhorn</title>
		<link>http://www.decaturmetro.com/2011/12/05/decatur-still-georgias-most-walkable-city/#comment-163317</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dana Blankenhorn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 17:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.decaturmetro.com/?p=21282#comment-163317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does that mean that if me or my kid is run over by a car walking in the Lamont/Vidal area we can sue the neighbors? 

Almost makes me want to walk there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does that mean that if me or my kid is run over by a car walking in the Lamont/Vidal area we can sue the neighbors? </p>
<p>Almost makes me want to walk there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: At Home in Decatur</title>
		<link>http://www.decaturmetro.com/2011/12/05/decatur-still-georgias-most-walkable-city/#comment-163258</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[At Home in Decatur]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 14:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.decaturmetro.com/?p=21282#comment-163258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My understanding of the Lamont/Vidal situation is that there was never a poll, just some really vocal opponents who organized a petition.  There were plenty of folks there who were disappointed that they did not get a sidewalk, maybe even a majority--who knows?  But they didn&#039;t know enough to organize a counter-petition.  The problem is that the Lamont/Vidal decision didn&#039;t just affect Lamont/Vidal, it affected anyone in the city who might walk on Lamont/Vidal which connects Scott and Clairemont and is an alternative to walking along busy highways.  That&#039;s why I don&#039;t think it should be just a decision by the residents of the streets involved.  Others who use the streets should be able to weigh in too. And definitely it shouldn&#039;t be a decision of the loudest.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My understanding of the Lamont/Vidal situation is that there was never a poll, just some really vocal opponents who organized a petition.  There were plenty of folks there who were disappointed that they did not get a sidewalk, maybe even a majority&#8211;who knows?  But they didn&#8217;t know enough to organize a counter-petition.  The problem is that the Lamont/Vidal decision didn&#8217;t just affect Lamont/Vidal, it affected anyone in the city who might walk on Lamont/Vidal which connects Scott and Clairemont and is an alternative to walking along busy highways.  That&#8217;s why I don&#8217;t think it should be just a decision by the residents of the streets involved.  Others who use the streets should be able to weigh in too. And definitely it shouldn&#8217;t be a decision of the loudest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.decaturmetro.com/2011/12/05/decatur-still-georgias-most-walkable-city/#comment-163253</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 14:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.decaturmetro.com/?p=21282#comment-163253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe you&#039;re right, Steve, which just reveals a larger problem with the system. Only in single-entry subdivision thinking does the argument that sidewalks are only for the use of adjacent residents a relevant argument. In a connected city working to become even more connected (it&#039;s one of our key strategic goals, fer gawdsake), allowing resident wagon-circling to supersede larger goals is politically cowardly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe you&#8217;re right, Steve, which just reveals a larger problem with the system. Only in single-entry subdivision thinking does the argument that sidewalks are only for the use of adjacent residents a relevant argument. In a connected city working to become even more connected (it&#8217;s one of our key strategic goals, fer gawdsake), allowing resident wagon-circling to supersede larger goals is politically cowardly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: www.decaturmetro.com @ 2014-09-15 10:55:58 by W3 Total Cache -->