<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gwinnett Boasts New &#8220;Diverging Diamond&#8221; Interchanges</title>
	<atom:link href="/2011/09/08/gwinnett-boasts-new-diverging-diamond-interchanges/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.decaturmetro.com/2011/09/08/gwinnett-boasts-new-diverging-diamond-interchanges/</link>
	<description>Decatur Georgia News, Events, Atlanta News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 01:05:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gwinnett Village</title>
		<link>http://www.decaturmetro.com/2011/09/08/gwinnett-boasts-new-diverging-diamond-interchanges/#comment-139293</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gwinnett Village]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 13:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.decaturmetro.com/?p=20705#comment-139293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Understand the skepticism regarding the $750K price-tag. That cost only relates to the architectural component (which the CID is covering).  The County is paying for the actual DDI reconfiguration (the cost  for that is in the neighborhood of $4M. 

Regarding the pedestrian component, the new design will be much more pedestrian friendly than the current layout. If you&#039;ve ever been on that interchange you know that it is actually a bit scary to walk across. In an ideal world we would be building 15 foot sidewalks, but we have to work with current footprint of the bridge (replacing it is about another $80M).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Understand the skepticism regarding the $750K price-tag. That cost only relates to the architectural component (which the CID is covering).  The County is paying for the actual DDI reconfiguration (the cost  for that is in the neighborhood of $4M. </p>
<p>Regarding the pedestrian component, the new design will be much more pedestrian friendly than the current layout. If you&#8217;ve ever been on that interchange you know that it is actually a bit scary to walk across. In an ideal world we would be building 15 foot sidewalks, but we have to work with current footprint of the bridge (replacing it is about another $80M).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dygituljunky</title>
		<link>http://www.decaturmetro.com/2011/09/08/gwinnett-boasts-new-diverging-diamond-interchanges/#comment-139172</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dygituljunky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 20:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.decaturmetro.com/?p=20705#comment-139172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They would be much better off making double-roundabout diamond interchanges.

The interstate would still pass over or under the surface street but the intersections between the ramps and the surface street would happen at roundabouts instead of standard intersections or this DDI mess.

See: http://maps.google.com/maps?q=vail,+colorado&amp;hl=en&amp;ll=39.644139,-106.377879&amp;spn=0.004759,0.009645&amp;sll=37.0625,-95.677068&amp;sspn=40.001301,79.013672&amp;vpsrc=6&amp;t=h&amp;z=17 and http://maps.google.com/maps?q=vail,+colorado&amp;hl=en&amp;ll=39.6279,-106.420586&amp;spn=0.00238,0.004823&amp;sll=37.0625,-95.677068&amp;sspn=40.001301,79.013672&amp;vpsrc=6&amp;t=h&amp;z=18]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They would be much better off making double-roundabout diamond interchanges.</p>
<p>The interstate would still pass over or under the surface street but the intersections between the ramps and the surface street would happen at roundabouts instead of standard intersections or this DDI mess.</p>
<p>See: <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?q=vail,+colorado&#038;hl=en&#038;ll=39.644139,-106.377879&#038;spn=0.004759,0.009645&#038;sll=37.0625,-95.677068&#038;sspn=40.001301,79.013672&#038;vpsrc=6&#038;t=h&#038;z=17" rel="nofollow">http://maps.google.com/maps?q=vail,+colorado&#038;hl=en&#038;ll=39.644139,-106.377879&#038;spn=0.004759,0.009645&#038;sll=37.0625,-95.677068&#038;sspn=40.001301,79.013672&#038;vpsrc=6&#038;t=h&#038;z=17</a> and <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?q=vail,+colorado&#038;hl=en&#038;ll=39.6279,-106.420586&#038;spn=0.00238,0.004823&#038;sll=37.0625,-95.677068&#038;sspn=40.001301,79.013672&#038;vpsrc=6&#038;t=h&#038;z=18" rel="nofollow">http://maps.google.com/maps?q=vail,+colorado&#038;hl=en&#038;ll=39.6279,-106.420586&#038;spn=0.00238,0.004823&#038;sll=37.0625,-95.677068&#038;sspn=40.001301,79.013672&#038;vpsrc=6&#038;t=h&#038;z=18</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby</title>
		<link>http://www.decaturmetro.com/2011/09/08/gwinnett-boasts-new-diverging-diamond-interchanges/#comment-138368</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bobby]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 22:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.decaturmetro.com/?p=20705#comment-138368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will they dress up the existing bridge?  The TIA project for a new bridge on Jimmy Carter Blvd at I-85 did not make the unconstrained list.  I think the existing, seven lane bridge is wide enough for a six lane DDI.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will they dress up the existing bridge?  The TIA project for a new bridge on Jimmy Carter Blvd at I-85 did not make the unconstrained list.  I think the existing, seven lane bridge is wide enough for a six lane DDI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WAH</title>
		<link>http://www.decaturmetro.com/2011/09/08/gwinnett-boasts-new-diverging-diamond-interchanges/#comment-138348</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WAH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 20:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.decaturmetro.com/?p=20705#comment-138348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re right...if there were no sidewalks and to cross the street I had to use a vine to swing over a lake filled with crocodiles just like in Pitfall, the diverging diamond would still be a terrible idea.

Terrible, over sized, hostile, and unwalkable...none of those words invite any sort of relative comparison...riiiiiiiiiiiight.

Anyway, the DDI is &#039;auto focused&#039;...but it doesn&#039;t mean it craps on the needs of pedestrians or can only be a &#039;modest&#039; improvement. Just because they aren&#039;t burning down the ramps to 285 and replacing the bridge with a single lane roadway surrounded by Elysian fields doesn&#039;t mean it can&#039;t be pedestrian friendly.  Somewhere in the world, there will be busy roads...I think they can coexist with pedestrians if we try.

Wide sidewalks, clearer traffic signals, marked/upgraded/working cross walks, and new trees are all a part of the design to incorporate that corridor with the other many pedestrian improvements throughout the PCID.

As far as the loaded statement about &#039;community priorities&#039;...well, Decatur in itself doesn&#039;t have to make many choices about intersections with interstates and that has nothing to do with community priorities.  Anyway, a good example would be improvements at Scott-NDR-Medlock...I can tell you that crossing that intersection has never been a good idea. I&#039;m still not sure how I survived the bike rides from Glennwood Estates to Medlock Park.  If traffic improvements were made at that intersection, it would probably be &#039;auto-focused&#039;, but I imagine it would still result in a much more friendly ped environment.

One last note and I&#039;ll leave with this...the AJC, as usual, missed the boat. Note this &#039;small detail&#039; of why some Gwineetians are envisioning this a a symbol for the area.

http://www.bizjournals.com/atlanta/news/2011/09/09/bridge-to-provide-new-gateway-to.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right&#8230;if there were no sidewalks and to cross the street I had to use a vine to swing over a lake filled with crocodiles just like in Pitfall, the diverging diamond would still be a terrible idea.</p>
<p>Terrible, over sized, hostile, and unwalkable&#8230;none of those words invite any sort of relative comparison&#8230;riiiiiiiiiiiight.</p>
<p>Anyway, the DDI is &#8216;auto focused&#8217;&#8230;but it doesn&#8217;t mean it craps on the needs of pedestrians or can only be a &#8216;modest&#8217; improvement. Just because they aren&#8217;t burning down the ramps to 285 and replacing the bridge with a single lane roadway surrounded by Elysian fields doesn&#8217;t mean it can&#8217;t be pedestrian friendly.  Somewhere in the world, there will be busy roads&#8230;I think they can coexist with pedestrians if we try.</p>
<p>Wide sidewalks, clearer traffic signals, marked/upgraded/working cross walks, and new trees are all a part of the design to incorporate that corridor with the other many pedestrian improvements throughout the PCID.</p>
<p>As far as the loaded statement about &#8216;community priorities&#8217;&#8230;well, Decatur in itself doesn&#8217;t have to make many choices about intersections with interstates and that has nothing to do with community priorities.  Anyway, a good example would be improvements at Scott-NDR-Medlock&#8230;I can tell you that crossing that intersection has never been a good idea. I&#8217;m still not sure how I survived the bike rides from Glennwood Estates to Medlock Park.  If traffic improvements were made at that intersection, it would probably be &#8216;auto-focused&#8217;, but I imagine it would still result in a much more friendly ped environment.</p>
<p>One last note and I&#8217;ll leave with this&#8230;the AJC, as usual, missed the boat. Note this &#8216;small detail&#8217; of why some Gwineetians are envisioning this a a symbol for the area.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/atlanta/news/2011/09/09/bridge-to-provide-new-gateway-to.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.bizjournals.com/atlanta/news/2011/09/09/bridge-to-provide-new-gateway-to.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meg</title>
		<link>http://www.decaturmetro.com/2011/09/08/gwinnett-boasts-new-diverging-diamond-interchanges/#comment-138265</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Meg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 18:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.decaturmetro.com/?p=20705#comment-138265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Me too. Oh wait, I am from Gwinnett County. Sad, but happy to have moved to Decatur!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me too. Oh wait, I am from Gwinnett County. Sad, but happy to have moved to Decatur!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: www.decaturmetro.com @ 2014-09-15 02:43:22 by W3 Total Cache -->