<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: First Waffle House May Acquire &quot;Historic&quot; Status</title> <atom:link href="/2009/04/09/first-waffle-house-acquire-historic-status/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.decaturmetro.com/2009/04/09/first-waffle-house-acquire-historic-status/</link> <description>Decatur Georgia News, Events, Atlanta News</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 01:52:45 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator> <item><title>By: HDog</title><link>http://www.decaturmetro.com/2009/04/09/first-waffle-house-acquire-historic-status/#comment-8182</link> <dc:creator>HDog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 23:53:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.decaturmetro.com/?p=20705#comment-8182</guid> <description>Yah, you are correct about that. no argument whatsoever from me.
Having spent a lot of time looking at the annexation over the past months though, being part of Avondale is not a viable solution either.
To a person, every one of the property owners I spoke with in the affected areas said, given a choice Decatur was the better choice.Avondale just shows up as  a very silly place.  In fact when you do the numbers it is very difficult to cost justify Avondale as an independent city.
The fact that they are persistently trying to annex these commercial districts for no other reason than for the added revenue is very telling. Yes, the stated purpose is gateway improvements, but I still have to say, look at &quot;downtown &quot; Avondale, tough to see why additional acreage is going to address  their difficulty creating a robust commercial district.
Perhaps a solution would be to have the City of Avondale disappear and have that whole area become part of Decatur.One example: I have worked in areas where low/no interest loans were available to property and business owners for storefront improvements.
The $$ already being spent forcing annexation down throats could used directly for that.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yah, you are correct about that. no argument whatsoever from me.<br
/> Having spent a lot of time looking at the annexation over the past months though, being part of Avondale is not a viable solution either.<br
/> To a person, every one of the property owners I spoke with in the affected areas said, given a choice Decatur was the better choice.</p><p>Avondale just shows up as  a very silly place.  In fact when you do the numbers it is very difficult to cost justify Avondale as an independent city.<br
/> The fact that they are persistently trying to annex these commercial districts for no other reason than for the added revenue is very telling. Yes, the stated purpose is gateway improvements, but I still have to say, look at &#8220;downtown &#8221; Avondale, tough to see why additional acreage is going to address  their difficulty creating a robust commercial district.<br
/> Perhaps a solution would be to have the City of Avondale disappear and have that whole area become part of Decatur.</p><p>One example: I have worked in areas where low/no interest loans were available to property and business owners for storefront improvements.<br
/> The $$ already being spent forcing annexation down throats could used directly for that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: GAK</title><link>http://www.decaturmetro.com/2009/04/09/first-waffle-house-acquire-historic-status/#comment-8184</link> <dc:creator>GAK</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 16:16:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.decaturmetro.com/?p=20705#comment-8184</guid> <description>Right.  Obvioulsy, being in unicorporated DeKalb has worked so well that we have no reason to look for other alternatives to kick-start re-development.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right.  Obvioulsy, being in unicorporated DeKalb has worked so well that we have no reason to look for other alternatives to kick-start re-development.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: HDog</title><link>http://www.decaturmetro.com/2009/04/09/first-waffle-house-acquire-historic-status/#comment-8183</link> <dc:creator>HDog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 02:40:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.decaturmetro.com/?p=20705#comment-8183</guid> <description>Yep, Annexation would spruce that strip right up .... just like downtown Avondale, right?  Avondale has 2156 residents, a $2.6 -$3M dollar budget and 47 city employees. Historic Prez committees and business development committees, why the city has gotten so difficult for business to deal with they are actually considering creating another taxpayer funded city position of &quot;Business Liaison&quot; to help business owners deal with the city  ....... I guess it would be way to easy to actually have the current city employees lighten up and be a  little bit easier to deal with ...An enticing reason for those businesses to want to deal with another layer of government and all for the mere cost of another 15-20% increase in property taxes.In the areas targeted by Avondale for annexation  there are about 85%  of the property owners against annexation and 10% not responded or undecided. I guess  any kind of popular support is irrelevant these days.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, Annexation would spruce that strip right up &#8230;. just like downtown Avondale, right?  Avondale has 2156 residents, a $2.6 -$3M dollar budget and 47 city employees. Historic Prez committees and business development committees, why the city has gotten so difficult for business to deal with they are actually considering creating another taxpayer funded city position of &#8220;Business Liaison&#8221; to help business owners deal with the city  &#8230;&#8230;. I guess it would be way to easy to actually have the current city employees lighten up and be a  little bit easier to deal with &#8230;</p><p>An enticing reason for those businesses to want to deal with another layer of government and all for the mere cost of another 15-20% increase in property taxes.</p><p>In the areas targeted by Avondale for annexation  there are about 85%  of the property owners against annexation and 10% not responded or undecided. I guess  any kind of popular support is irrelevant these days.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Decatur Metro</title><link>http://www.decaturmetro.com/2009/04/09/first-waffle-house-acquire-historic-status/#comment-8181</link> <dc:creator>Decatur Metro</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 15:34:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.decaturmetro.com/?p=20705#comment-8181</guid> <description>That can&#039;t be it.  They must just be a bunch of tax-loving socialists. ;-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That can&#8217;t be it.  They must just be a bunch of tax-loving socialists. <img
src='http://www.decaturmetro.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Scott</title><link>http://www.decaturmetro.com/2009/04/09/first-waffle-house-acquire-historic-status/#comment-8180</link> <dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 14:22:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.decaturmetro.com/?p=20705#comment-8180</guid> <description>Understanding you probably asked the question rhetorically, maybe it&#039;s because WH is smart enough to realize that destination enterprises (like the museum) fare better when they&#039;re not in crappy destinations. If that strip didn&#039;t have all the charm of bombed out Detroit, maybe they&#039;d be open more often than by appointment only.(I really wanted to incorporate some kind of scattered and smothered quip into my post but came up with nothin&#039;. Dang!)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Understanding you probably asked the question rhetorically, maybe it&#8217;s because WH is smart enough to realize that destination enterprises (like the museum) fare better when they&#8217;re not in crappy destinations. If that strip didn&#8217;t have all the charm of bombed out Detroit, maybe they&#8217;d be open more often than by appointment only.</p><p>(I really wanted to incorporate some kind of scattered and smothered quip into my post but came up with nothin&#8217;. Dang!)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 410/414 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.decaturmetro.com @ 2012-07-25 04:03:02 -->